Cue vs Krisp: Voice Agent or Call Audio AI?
Cue and Krisp can both produce meeting notes without adding a participant to the call. Krisp's homepage presents voice AI for meetings and names noise cancellation, accent AI, translation and an AI note taker as its capabilities, aimed at teams, call centers and developers. Cue takes a different shape: it is a desktop voice agent where meeting capture sits next to voice typing in supported apps, so the notes can feed the work that follows.
Cue is a desktop voice agent. You start the meeting recorder yourself, nothing joins the participant list, and the same app handles voice typing in supported apps with a normal text field. One download, one account, one public plan.
Krisp's official pages describe voice AI for meetings that combines noise cancellation, accent AI and translation with a bot-free AI note taker, and name call centers alongside teams and developers as audiences.
Pick the job you need now
These are entry points into the same Cue product, account, download, and pricing.
Start from the task on screen
Speak a request and use the current desktop context to prepare work you can review.
Explore Voice Agent workflows →Turn speech into text
Choose your desktop and start with the field where you are already typing.
Capture notes without a bot
Start the desktop capture when you choose, see a progressive transcript, then review structured notes.
Explore meeting notes →Side-by-side workflow comparison
Swipe the table to compare Cue and Krisp →
| Workflow | Cue | Krisp |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Desktop voice agent that covers voice typing in supported apps plus user-started meeting capture | Krisp's homepage headline describes the product as voice AI for meetings, with noise cancellation, accent AI, translation and an AI note taker listed as the capabilities |
| Meeting capture | A desktop recorder you start yourself; nothing joins the participant list, and Cue can offer the recorder when it recognizes meeting context | Its AI Note Taker page presents the note taker as bot-free, states that no bots join your calls, and states that it needs no browser plugin or extension; the homepage also offers an optional bot that can be enabled to join meetings |
| Meeting result | A progressive transcript during longer meetings, then structured notes and action items after you stop the recorder | Its AI Note Taker page states the feature transcribes in real time, summarizes and shares notes from online or offline meetings |
| After the meeting | Use the notes and action items as the starting point for follow-up work you dictate or review in a supported app | Krisp states that after a meeting you can review notes, share transcripts, assign action items and set priorities, with action items captured automatically |
| Where meeting data sits | Cue's own privacy page is the reference for how meeting audio, transcripts and notes are handled | Its AI Note Taker page carries a security bullet reading 'No voice data visible to Krisp servers', while its security page states the AI Meeting Assistant stores more data in Krisp Cloud and gives meeting transcripts and recordings as examples; its official pricing page currently lists on-device private transcription and recordings under the Enterprise plan; verify current terms |
| Current platforms | macOS 13+ on Apple Silicon and Intel, and Windows 10+ on x64 | Its AI Note Taker page currently lists desktop apps for Windows and macOS and mobile apps for iOS and Android, and the homepage states the mobile app does not currently include noise cancellation; verify current terms |
| Starting plan | Cue is free to start. Cue Plus is $19.99/month. | Its official pricing page currently lists a 7-day Free Trial at $0 with no credit card required, then Core at $16/mo/user on monthly billing or $8/mo/user on annual billing, and Advanced at $30/mo/user on monthly billing; a permanently free Meeting AI plan is not stated on the pages checked; verify current terms |
What Krisp does well
Krisp is built around the sound of a call, and it shows in how the product is described. The homepage headline calls it voice AI for meetings and names teams, call centers and developers as the audiences, with noise cancellation, accent AI, translation and an AI note taker listed together as one set of capabilities. The AI Note Taker page carries that through: it presents the note taker as bot-free, states that no bots join your calls, frames that approach as a privacy property, and says the feature needs no browser plugin or extension. It transcribes in real time, summarizes, and shares notes from online or offline meetings, and after the call you can review notes, share transcripts, assign action items and set priorities, with action items captured automatically. The homepage also lists the calendar, conferencing, chat, CRM and automation tools Krisp fits into, and an optional bot you can enable if you do want one in the meeting. For a team whose daily pain is a noisy line and whose notes need to land in an existing stack, that is a coherent package.
Cue starts from a different question: what happens with your voice on the desktop all day, not only during calls. Cue is a desktop voice agent, and meeting capture is one of its entry points rather than the whole product. You start the recorder yourself, nothing joins the participant list, a progressive transcript appears during longer meetings, and structured notes and action items arrive after you stop. The same app also handles voice typing in supported apps with a normal text field, which is the part that keeps running between meetings. Cue does not process call audio the way Krisp's noise cancellation, accent AI and translation features do, and Krisp covers mobile where Cue does not. The honest read is that these are two different shapes: pick Krisp if the call itself is the thing to improve, and pick Cue if you want one desktop voice workflow that carries from dictation into meeting notes and the follow-up work after them.
Official Krisp sources
Competitor details above were checked on September 15, 2026. Plans and platform availability can change, so verify the current source before deciding.
- Krisp homepage — Product positioning as voice AI for meetings, the audiences and capabilities named in the subheadline, the optional bot that can be enabled, the categories of tools Krisp fits into, and the note that the mobile app does not currently include noise cancellation
- Krisp AI Note Taker — Bot-free framing and the statement that no bots join your calls, no browser plugin or extension needed, real-time transcription with summaries and sharing, the after-meeting actions, the listed desktop and mobile platforms, and the 'No voice data visible to Krisp servers' security bullet
- Krisp pricing — The 7-day Free Trial at $0 with no credit card required, Core at $16/mo/user monthly and $8/mo/user annual with unlimited AI note-taking and a one hour per day accent conversion cap, Advanced at $30/mo/user monthly with 60 GB storage, and on-device private transcription listed under Enterprise
- Krisp security — Statement that the AI Meeting Assistant stores more data in Krisp Cloud, with meeting transcripts and recordings given as examples
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for bot-free meeting notes, Cue or Krisp?
Both can produce meeting notes without adding a participant bot to the call. Krisp's AI Note Taker page presents the feature as bot-free and states that no bots join your calls, alongside noise cancellation, accent AI and translation on the wider product. Cue is a desktop voice agent: you start the recorder yourself, nothing joins the participant list, and the same app covers voice typing in supported apps. The fit question is whether you mainly need the call audio itself improved, which points to Krisp, or one desktop voice workflow that continues after the meeting ends, which points to Cue.
Does Krisp put a bot in my meetings?
Krisp's AI Note Taker page presents the note taker as bot-free, states that no bots join your calls, frames that as a privacy property, and states that the feature needs no browser plugin or extension. Krisp's homepage separately offers an optional bot that can be enabled to join meetings, so joining is presented as a choice rather than the default. Cue takes the same no-participant approach for its own meeting capture: the desktop recorder is started by you and nothing appears in the participant list. Check Krisp's current official pages before deciding, because vendor behavior can change.
Does Krisp transcribe meetings on device?
Partly, and it depends on the plan and the language. Krisp's AI Note Taker page carries a security bullet reading 'No voice data visible to Krisp servers', while Krisp states elsewhere that English transcription runs on device and other languages use server-based transcription. Krisp's security page states that the AI Meeting Assistant stores more data in Krisp Cloud, giving meeting transcripts and recordings as examples, and its pricing page lists on-device private transcription and recordings as an Enterprise plan line item rather than a Core or Advanced one. If on-device handling is a requirement, confirm the current terms for the specific plan and languages you need.
Is Cue free?
Cue is free to start. Cue Plus is $19.99/month. Cue runs on macOS 13+ with Apple Silicon or Intel and on Windows 10+ on x64. Krisp's official pricing page currently lists a 7-day Free Trial at $0 with no credit card required, then Core at $16/mo/user on monthly billing or $8/mo/user on annual billing; a permanently free Meeting AI plan is not stated on the pages checked. Competitor plans change, so verify Krisp's current pricing page before you decide.
Start with the workflow you actually need
If the call audio is the problem, compare Krisp's official pages directly. If you want one desktop voice workflow that covers voice typing and meeting notes, start with Cue on Mac or Windows.
Download free ← Back to alternativesTry a workflow you can check
For Cue, use a reviewed excerpt to build an action table from meeting notes. Then follow the after-meeting learning path to prepare an update and a follow-up draft. This is a Cue exercise, not a head-to-head benchmark or evidence that one product is better.